SZABIST had great potential when it was founded. It was the brain-child of a prime minister (BB), was being led by an accomplished academic (Dr. Laghari), had a generous endowment (speculated to be $20m), a satellite campus in the city, and massive land allotment on the outskirts of Karachi (2,200 acres). This is going to be the next GIK is what people thought. Bombarded by a formidable marketing campaign, parents and students actually believed the hype, however, the industry was skeptical.
The strategy of SZABIST seems to have been more focused on generating headlines, rather than creating impact. What makes an institute outstanding? Quality faculty, quality students and quality research which is essentially a by-product of the first two. Does it matter that the university has a radio station, an isp, a software house, and mediocre campuses in Dubai and Islamabad? In my opinion, opening multiple campuses was one of the gravest mistakes made by the management. Rather than focusing energy and resources to improve academic quality and research facilities in the main campus, they rushed to set up campuses that diluted the value of an already fragile brand. The reputation of SZABIST Dubai and Islamabad is so egregiously poor that I try to avoid the subject of my undergraduate degree altogether when I’m in those two cities.
So in Fall 2001, when I resumed the semester at SZABIST life was great socially, especially after the seclusion of PIEAS. I was in Karachi, hanging out with old friends and meeting people with whom I clicked. Academically, however, it was a mixed bag.
In the thirty or so courses I took at zabist, I can only recall 4 that were taught by instructors who had the ability to engage, challenge and motivate. Logic and Scientific Enquiry by Dr. Shabbir Ahsan, MIS by Zeeshan Arshad, Introduction to Business by Faisal Abdullah, and Bootstrapping Business Ventures by Jawwad Farid.
There was one entire final year course, titled Multimedia Systems, that focused on making pretty 3D Max models and another loftily titled “Research Report” in which students were expected to choose a topic, plagiarise, reformat and submit. Marking was based on how even the indentation was. And of course, how can I forget the full 1 semester course on photoshop and freehand!?! If this was the curriculum for Al Khair or Preston, I would understand. But for an institute that markets itself as the leading SciTech school in Asia?
SZABIST had a two sided dilemma. Often the teachers weren’t qualified enough to challenge the students, and the students weren’t driven enough to challenge the teachers. Students objected vociferously to any proposed addition to the course outline. Lessons were not about gaining knowledge, but about memorizing enough to crack the hourlies (mid terms). The instructors who did have deep expertise in their subjects didn’t seem too inclined to push the students beyond their lazy comfort zones.
The academic quality of szabist while better than many institutes in Karachi didn’t compare with the likes of GIK, NUST, PIEAS or LUMS. More pointedly, the academic quality fell far short of the expectations szabist built by its unrestrained marketing prowess.
For a fair assessment, however, one has to see what the alumni from the BCS program are doing 5 years on, and this is where szabist has done well. We entered into a hostile job market in which szabist was considered a tier-2 institute, and most newspaper job ads precluded consideration by specifying that only LUMS, GIK, NUST and IBA graduates were invited to apply. Despite these limitations, if I compare my batch (BCS 2003) with computer science students who graduated roughly at the same time from IBA and FAST, then in terms of salary and career progression my peers from SZABIST seem to be comparable.
So why did my batch do so well?
Because the student intake was of a higher quality as a direct result of the marketing blitz by SZABIST in the late 90s. But also because the SZABIST curriculum put a strong focus on presentation, writing and business skills. By the time a typical student graduated, he could write effectively and confidently present to a crowd. This meant that in business, especially, technology businesses, SZABIST BCS grads did well. Of course, they couldn’t solve equations or write code, hence only a handful went into technical careers.
-Adnan